University United Methodist Church
 
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line seperator
line separator

The Cross of Christ (Mark 8:27-9:1)

(A sermon preached September 17, 2006 at University UMC by Kennetha Bigham-Tsai)
 

The September 18 issue of Time Magazine features an article on a movement called the “Health and Wealth Gospel.” This movement is also referred to as “Name It and Claim It” or as “Prosperity Theology.” The Time Magazine article is entitled, “Does God Want You to Be Rich?”[1] 

This movement, notes Time, has been around for decades. It hit upon hard times with the scandals associated with some of the TV evangelists of the 1980s. However, it is now experiencing a resurgence.

The movement is based upon the premise that faithfulness to God promises material wealth, health and abundant blessing. The article in Time Magazine focuses on one of the newer faces of the movement--a televangelist named Joel Osteen, author of a popular book and pastor of a church where up to 25,000 people are in worship on Sundays—people who are sure that faithfulness to God will produce material blessing and financial security—people who are sure that Christianity, practiced rightly, promises money, health and good living.

Yet, here we have texts like this one in Mark that we have read this morning. This text in Mark suggests that Christian faith and indeed Christian discipleship has more to do with a cross than with material riches. For here we have Jesus on his way to the villages of Caesarea Philippi. But these little villages were just a stop on a more important journey. For, Jesus was ultimately on his way to Jerusalem. He was on his way to giving his life in obedience to God and in love for humankind. Jesus was on his way to the cross.

And as Jesus goes about this journey to the cross, he asks his disciples a question. “Who do people say that I am?” (Mk 8: 27). Now, thus far, no one had understood who Jesus was. Some thought him a prophet. Some thought him John the Baptist. Some thought him Elijah, the one who would precede the coming Messiah. People commonly misunderstood his identity, and Jesus wanted to find out if his disciples misunderstood as well. So he follows this first question with a second and more central question.  “Who do you say that I am?” asks Jesus. “Who do you, my followers—my disciples, say that I am?” 

And Peter answers rightly, “You are the Messiah. You are the one who has come for the salvation of the world.”

Now one of the things you must understand about the Gospel of Mark is that this Gospel features identity as a central theme. Mark is an author of identity. Indeed, one of Mark’s most central concerns is the identity of Jesus.

Yet, the Gospel of Mark, unlike the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, does not include a genealogy—that list of names that lays out the lineage of Jesus, (cf. Luke 3, Mat. 1). For indeed, Jesus is not who he is because of his lineage. He is not who he is because he is descendant from Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob, or from King David.  Jesus is who he is in Mark’s account because of what Jesus does—because of his mission. For Mark, Jesus’ identity is based upon his mission. Jesus is the Messiah because his is the mission and ministry of the Messiah.

And so Peter affirms Jesus’ identity as the Messiah, and Jesus begins to lay out what it means to be the Messiah. He ties his identity as Messiah to his mission, and his mission involves his journey to the cross. Jesus begins to teach his disciples that the Messiah—the Son of Man—the Christ-- must undergo great suffering, be rejected by the elders, the chief priests and the scribes--and then be killed--and after three days rise again, (Mk  8: 31). This is the first passion prediction in the Book of Mark, and it is placed here, in the context of Jesus’ identity, to send a very specific message. Jesus’ identity as Messiah cannot be understood apart from his mission—a mission that involves suffering and a cross.

Now it appears from the text that Peter, the model disciple, who answers Jesus rightly, truly understands Jesus’ identity, for Peter calls him the Messiah. Yet did Peter really get it right?

For when Jesus ties his identity as Messiah to a mission that involves suffering, Peter rebukes him. “Yes teacher, you are the Messiah,” Peter says, “But not a Messiah who is doomed to suffering and death. Yes, Jesus, you came to save. But the salvation you offer cannot come through a cross.”

It is evident from Peter’s response, from his rebuke of Jesus, that he does not understand the true nature of Messiahship. He and the other disciples likely believed that as Messiah, Jesus would come as conqueror and liberator to free them from the oppression of Rome. The Messiah of these disciples was to be their knight in shining armor. In their minds, perhaps, the Messiah was to bring them health, wealth, influence, and better living.

Now were Peter and those early disciples really so different from the people of today who believe that Christian faith is about their own material and physical well-being? Indeed, we must admit that many of the followers of the so-called health and wealth movement are struggling themselves—people who just want a little bit of financial and material security. Many who follow this theology are those who have been beaten down by life and just want a little relief.

Indeed, the man that Time Magazine interviewed for its article was an Ohio factory worker who got laid off of from his job because of the same dynamic that has caused such manufacturing job loss in our state. This man moved his family to Texas to be near that televangelist and to be inspired by the message that he too could achieve life more abundantly.

This man is perhaps no different than Peter and the early disciples. And they were perhaps no different than this man from Ohio and from the many people today who just want a little relief. Peter and the disciples and those who heard Jesus’ early preaching wanted a little relief from the oppression of Rome. They wanted a Messiah who would be king, who would put them back up on top of the world instead of under the boot of a conqueror.

Yet here was Jesus talking about death on a cross. Here was their Messiah teaching them about suffering instead of helping them dream of the spoils of victory.

Here was Jesus telling them what they did not want to hear.

Yet it was crucial that they hear it. It was crucial that the disciples understand this, for Jesus’ identity was tied to their identity. For a disciple you see is one who models his or her life after the life of another. A disciple is one who follows another. The disciples had to understand what it meant to be Messiah if they were to understand what it meant to follow that Messiah. 

And so Jesus teaches them that just as the Messiah cannot be the Messiah without suffering, so the disciples of that Messiah cannot be true disciples without suffering. “If any want to become my followers, my disciples,” Jesus says, “Let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me,” (Mk 8: 34). 

This teaching about taking up the cross of Christ’s suffering is not just a message for the early disciples. It is a message for us today. For, this teaching is at the core of the meaning of Christian discipleship—it is at the core of who we are as disciples.

Now I want to say strongly, that yes discipleship involves suffering and self sacrifice, but not just any kind of suffering and sacrifice. Being a Christian disciple does not involve suffering that destroys the human spirit. For instance, Christian discipleship does not involve or justify the suffering involved in abusive relationships. It does not involve or justify the suffering inherent in debilitating and unending poverty. Christian discipleship does not involve or justify the suffering involved in horrible and senseless acts of violence--like the act of violence this nation experienced on September 11 five years ago. This text on discipleship is not talking about that kind of senseless, non-redemptive suffering.

No this text in Mark is talking about a type of suffering and self-sacrifice that helps to ease the suffering of the world. This is a redemptive type of sacrifice and suffering. But it is also a type of sacrifice and suffering that involves the giving up of privilege for the cause of social justice.

One of the primary problems with the health and wealth gospel—despite its adherence to a culture of materialism—one of its primary problems is also its individualism. It is a gospel primarily about health and wealth for me and mine. It is about me and my family and my people. It is ultimately about self and not about the other. And in this sense it seems hardly biblical. For if you look at the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ ministry and life, you find very little concern for his own personal enrichment. You find instead a Christ who lifted up the needs of the poor, who ministered to the dispossessed, the pushed aside, and the marginalized. You find a Christ who was wholly other-centered—a Christ who calls us to be other-centered and to so bear the cross of the self denial involved in being his disciples.

Such cross-bearing discipleship is at the core of our call to work for social justice, for to work for justice as Christ’s disciples, we must sacrifice by letting go of some of our own privilege and concern for self. To work for justice as Christ’s disciples, we must sometimes suffer the ridicule and disfavor that comes with dissent. To work for justice as Christ’s disciples, we must sometimes deny ourselves popularity and privilege and comfort and take up the cross of Christ. And we too will be rejected as Christ was rejected. We too will suffer as Christ suffered.

One of the issues that the health and wealth gospel does not address is the huge economic disparity that exists in our country and around the world. This issue was laid bare for us here in this country by the tragedy of hurricane Katrina. Katrina laid wide open for this nation the intense economic disparity evident in the city of New Orleans and in other cities in our great nation. Katrina put U.S. poverty on national television during prime time. The tragedy of Katrina also laid bare the intersection of poverty and race in New Orleans and around our country. 

These issues of poverty and economic justice and racial justice are issues the church must address. And there are others. There are issues of environmental justice and stewardship that we must address. There are issues around how we will deal with immigration and with the needs of those who come here as immigrants. There are issues around how we will interact with people of other faiths as our country becomes, not just more racially and culturally diverse, but more religiously diverse.

There are also issues around how we will respond to violence around the world and at home, and how we will bring about peace. And right now there is a debate going on over how we will treat our enemies—or those accused of being our enemies. Will we honor the Geneva conventions or will we use judicial processes and methods of interrogation that raise moral and ethical questions?

These are conversations that the church must engage, and they are conversations that involve issues of social justice. They are conversations that will involve bearing the cross of Christian discipleship around issues of social justice, for they are conversations just like the ones Jesus had to deal with on his way to the cross. For these were the kinds of issues and conversations he engaged when he asked the Pharisees why they tithed the mint and the cumin and made great religious displays yet neglected the widow and the orphan. These are the kinds of conversations and issues the Jesus engaged when he violated Sabbath law and tradition to challenge the hardness of heart that would leave a man lame because of a rule. These are the kinds of conversations and issues that Jesus engaged when he allowed an unclean woman to touch him and be healed and then affirmed her bodacity by saying that her faith had healed her.

These are issues Jesus engaged on his journey to the cross.  For his call, his ministry and his mission, was not about personal enrichment, privilege or comfort. Indeed his ministry and mission had more to do with sacrifice of personal privilege and comfort. It had to do with suffering and rejection. And he called his disciples to do the same. For as he said, “Whoever wants to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the Gospel, will save it,” (Mk 8:35).

Yet we are tempted, like Peter was, to set our minds on our human fears and concerns rather than upon the things of God. And so we are tempted to deny the cross of the work for justice to which we are called. We are tempted friends, but we must not give in to this temptation. For if we do--if we deny the cross we’ve been called to bear--then we also deny ourselves the power that comes with leading Christ-like, cross-bearing lives.

For indeed, Jesus went to the cross as he predicted in this passage in Mark. He underwent great suffering as he predicted. He was rejected by the elders, the chief priests, the scribes and even the disciples as he predicted. And he was killed in a horrible and merciless way as he predicted. Yet in three days, he rose with power—with the power to save, and to heal and to mend broken hearts and broken lives. He rose with an eternal power that impacts our lives today, because each of us has been forever changed because of the power and grace that have come through Christ. For, there is something to the cross of Christ beyond suffering. In the cross of Christ there is also power.

This simple fact is what the Apostle Paul expressed in the passage we read earlier in Philippians 3. “I want to know Christ in the power of his resurrection and in the fellowship of his suffering,” (Philippians 3:10).

Paul knew what we must understand today--that when we join Christ in the fellowship of his suffering—when we bear the cross of Christian discipleship by standing for justice—then we join Christ in his power. For with such cross-bearing comes the power to break down the walls of poverty, and of violence, and of racism and exclusion. With such cross-bearing comes the power to bring about justice for all people and for the earth.

Friends, on issues of justice in our world today, the Church has a voice—this church has a voice for which people are hungering. On issues of justice in our world today the Church—this church has a witness—for which people are thirsting. On issues of justice in our world today the Church—this church has the power to effect meaningful change—change for which people are hungering and thirsting.

We have this power friends, but only when we are willing to take on the cross of discipleship and walk in the footsteps of Christ. We do this when we stand against injustice and stand for justice. And though this involves risk, why not? For what will it profit us to gain the whole world and forfeit our lives and very souls? What will it profit us to be ashamed of a Gospel that says that it is not about my health and my wealth—but about the cross of Christ—about his kingdom come with power—about the power to bring about justice, and peace, and inclusion, and reconciliation and love--about the power of the church to bring to fruition our prayer, “…let thy kingdom come and thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”

Who do people say that I am? I am the Christ—the Messiah, Jesus said. And who do people say that we are? We are his disciples.

And, if we are, then let us deny ourselves and take up the cross of Christ and follow him. Let us lose our lives for the sake of Christ and for his Gospel. And let us be the witnesses of his kingdom come with power. Amen.

[1] Does God Want You to Be Rich? By David Van Biema and Jeff Chu, Time Magazine, September 18, 2006.